The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) on Friday announces the top performing schools for June 2013 Social Worker board examination. Bicol University (BU)-Daraga, Saint Louis University (SLU) and Mindanao State University -Marawi City are the listed top performing schools. Complete list of performance of schools are available here.
Bicol University- Daraga got 98.15% passing percentage or 53 out of 54 examinees passed. Meanwhile, SLU and MSU has 96.08 and 89.13 passing rate respectively.
PRC named 1,015 out of 1,827 who passed the Social Worker Licensure Examination given by the Board for Social Workers in the cities of Manila, Baguio, Cagayan de Oro, Cebu, Davao, Iloilo, Legazpi and Zamboanga this June 2013.
See the list of passers here.
The performance of schools in the June 2013 Social Worker Board Examination in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) “To monitor the performance of schools in licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of national circulation” is as follows: (Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.)
Bicol University- Daraga got 98.15% passing percentage or 53 out of 54 examinees passed. Meanwhile, SLU and MSU has 96.08 and 89.13 passing rate respectively.
PRC named 1,015 out of 1,827 who passed the Social Worker Licensure Examination given by the Board for Social Workers in the cities of Manila, Baguio, Cagayan de Oro, Cebu, Davao, Iloilo, Legazpi and Zamboanga this June 2013.
See the list of passers here.
The performance of schools in the June 2013 Social Worker Board Examination in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) “To monitor the performance of schools in licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of national circulation” is as follows: (Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.)